On 09. 08. 19 14:28, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 9:27 AM Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org
<mailto:ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Well, it was retired because it did not built since F30 mass rebuild…
I went ahead and built it with the testsuite disabled for now: I suppose any
Proven Packager could also have done, but yeah normally it should be done by the
maintainers.
I admit the ball was dropped on this by various people (myself included), and
sorry about that. [1]
The new major upstream release was also a long time coming...
But to me the deeper question is still "why are we proactively breaking the
distro" in this way with package retirements by non-maintainers?
Because if we don't, people just gonna ignore FTBFS forever.
Could we have known that gettext will be unretired right away anyway? Probably
yes, but nobody got time / energy / resources to do any kind of analysis of the
FTBFS packages.
Next time, I hope that FTBFS bugs for critical component are actually actively
solved sooner than the retirement happens. We can try to be more aggressive with
the reminders, but I don't know if that helps, because even currently, packages
just switch the Bugzilla to ASSIGNED to stop them.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
