>>>>> "TH" == Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> writes:
TH> Presumably in this case the performance penalty was considered small TH> enough that it was worth building even production code with this TH> mode enabled. I'd like to know if any performance analysis was done about this, because the upstream of a package I help maintain (prusa-slicer) has also indicated to me that they aren't in favor of compiling with GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS in code which is computationally expensive and not security sensitive. (This after the assertion found an actual bug in their code.) The only answer I could give was that any code which can open downloaded files is "security sensitive" in some fashion, and presumably the gcc/glibc developers have evaluated the performance impact. Is there any reference I could use to answer such questions? - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
