On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Kaleb Keithley <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > >> On 7/25/19 11:05 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >> > hmmm. from the root.log >> > >> > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error: >> > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests >> > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides kernel >= 4.18.0 >> > needed by firewalld-0.6.4-1.fc31.noarch >> > >> > how to deal with this? Wait for a new firewalld package? >> >> Yep. >> >> I have asked the 'dropping i686 kernels' change owner to file bugs on >> these packages. >> >> Looks like: >> >> firewalld-0.7.1-1.fc31.src.rpm >> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733602 > > One of the suggestions there is to "drop the arch." I.e. i686. > > If that ends up being the solution that pretty much would force me to drop > the arch too for glusterfs. (GlusterFS has a bit of plumbing around opening > ports in the firewall. It might just fail — silently or not so silently. > It's hard to know, nobody has tested it. > > I suspect dropping the arch might cause some amount of heartache in some > circles. > > OTOH, I haven't paid close enough attention to really understand what it > means to stop building i686 kernels. Does that mean no Fedora distribution > for i686 hardware? Does it even make sense to keep building glusterfs for > i686? > > Yes it means no Fedora distribution for i686 for F31+. I would say that unless your binary is needed for multi-arch, then it also does not make sense to make it for i686 at this point. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
