On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jon Masters <jonat...@jonmasters.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote: >> > pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: >> > >> >> I know its been discussed in the past but there's been reasons not to >> >> drop a default MTA but now that cronie (the last actual dependency) >> >> has support for logging to system logs is there any reason to include >> >> an MTA by default for F-14? >> > >> > A bit late to consider for F-14 imo (I'd argue something like should in >> > place and testable by or near feature freeze), F-15 is doable. >> >> Test what? That no MTA is present? >> >> I'd say we should stop arguing forever and just do it. > > What's the benefit of having no default MTA at all? Is it that Desktop > users don't care about MTAs being installed? what about those of us who > care more about server installations than Desktop?
In a server config I'm sure the person configuring the server would know how to install a MTA, and in a lot of cases they might not want sendmail but rather say postfix/exim etc. All its doing is removing it from the base and core groups in comps. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
