>>>>> "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> writes:
ZD> Converted to spaces now. Well I appreciate that, but my point is that it's really personal preference. ZD> It is designed for user to run rpmdev-bumpspec ZD> <package>.spec, so the tool will supply correct format of changelog ZD> entry and increment the release. That seems to be rather abstruse. I mean, by default vim can already add a proper changelog entry directly (assuming you're not doing anything "interesting" with Version: and Release:). It doesn't seem logical to present an invalid specfile by default and then force someone to run an external tool to make it valid. If an external step is always required, wouldn't it make more sense to have that step be the initial copying of the user's preferred template into place? - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
