Le vendredi 19 juillet 2019 à 08:48 +0200, Remi Collet a écrit : > Le 18/07/2019 à 18:26, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit : > > > "Build dependencies on Fedora packages which provide pkg-config > > > files SHOULD be expressed > > > as pkgconfig(foo) and not foo-devel, whether the dependent > > > package uses pkg-config or not." > > > > This is true for the fast majority of cases. Specially where there > > is > > only one provider of pkgconfig(foo). > > > > But sometime there is a need for a compat library and then I don't > > know if my package may uses the main library of the compat one. > > pkgconfig(foo) will pick one or the other, but using the package > > name > > is more deterministic to me. > > > > Indeed, pkgconfig(foo) start to raise issues when multiple providers > exists. > > One example is pkgconfig(openssl)
In quite a lot of cases versionned requires can disambiguate Otherwise I suppose it would make sense to add a Provides: pkgconfig(foo)(default) in the package providing the primary Fedora implementation Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
