On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:58 AM Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 7/15/19 11:34 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > Hello, Dridi Boukelmoune. > > > > Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:59 +0000 you wrote: > > > >> Emulate as in not run natively even though the hardware might be able > to? > > > > Sorry for misinformation. Wine64 is still require 32-bit libraries in > > order to run legacy 32-bit Windows PE executables. > > > > https://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#Is_there_a_64_bit_Wine.3F > > Exactly. I really do not understand this rush change. The original change, > to remove only 32 kernel > is definitely the way to go. But This one, should be postponded to f32, > with much better contingency > plan. > > > This proposal has nothing to do with wine/steam. They will continue to work just fine, multilib will still work as it's mentioned in change proposal. "multi-lib x86_64 repos will not be affected and all packages will still be built for i686 for this use case." All in all, I am +1 for this change. I don't even remember when I needed to build something 32 bit on 64 bit system locally, and as it stands in the proposal, it should still be doable.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
