On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure. In this case, though, i don't think we need it. I've > been building packages in a local mock for the last few days. I've > still got 6 to go, and so far I've only hit 2 issues, neither of them > related to MPFR. Unless something comes up with these last few, I > think we need the MPFR 3 and MPC-linked-with-MPFR-3 compatibility > packages only to get gcc switched over, then we can discard them and > have an entirely MPFR 4 distribution.
I'm down to these 3 still to go: arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs, avr-gcc, and cross-gcc. Those gcc builds take a long time. :-) So far the builds have gone smoothly. > Pavel, are you around? Some of these packages take a long time to > build, but I think if we had, say, a 4 or 5 day window in which the > gcc and texlive maintainers agreed not to do any new builds, we could > get Fedora switched entirely over to MPFR 4. We need to start > figuring out when that should happen. We are already past the > deadline for system-wide change proposals for Fedora 31, but if we get > our ducks in a row, we can perhaps get this into Fedora 32 as soon as > that window opens. (I'm assuming this will be a system-wide change > since it affects gcc.) Does anyone at RedHat know if Pavel is on vacation? If not, what is the best way to contact him? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
