On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 19:42, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > This has all worked just fine in the past, before it was decided to make > basically every single broken dependency fail the entire Rawhide compose. > Soname bumps did not even have to be announced, they would get announced > by > the broken dependency report within less than 24 hours anyway, and then > eventually fixed (without somebody unrealistically expecting maintainers > to > fix the broken dependency in less than 24 hours to make the next compose > succeed, which is just plain impossible for the average volunteer > packager, > especially if source code changes are needed). > > I am having a hard time reconciling the above with all the times you have angrily called out anyone who landed something broken in rawhide which affected what you wanted to do. > Kevin Kofler > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
