On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:07 AM Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu>
wrote:

> >>>>> "JP" == Jens-Ulrik Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> writes:
> I install a generic minimal system via kickstart (booted using the
> Server PXE images and using the Everything repositories) and then after
> the reboot, ansible runs (via ansible-pull) and installs whatever is
> needed for the type of system it's configured to be.
>

Okay I see, thanks: so presumably previously you were installing language
support groups.

Some time back lang supports groups also pulled in langpacks of
translations though.


> JP> One can also just try `dnf -n install langpacks-ko` to check what
> JP> fonts (and input method) would be pulled in, and you are free to
> JP> remove langpacks-ko anyway.
>
> Yes, though it's simpler to me to just pull the dependencies out of the
> langpacks specfile as I'm doing now.  Unfortunately that means I have to
> periodically recheck if, for example, the recommended font set for
> Gujarati happens to change in the future.  It's not an undue burden but
> it was nice to be able to rely on installing @gujarati-support as was
> the case pre-F30.
>

It sounds like what you probably really want is:

`dnf install @fonts @input-methods`

That will get you the default-installed system fonts and input methods (as
you would get in a standard Workstation install).

This kind of problem also becomes more relevant for Toolbox containers,
etc, which are also typically minimal installs.

JP> I am wondering how you reached 3GB - the Noto CJK fonts we now ship
> JP> are not small on disk - that might be a part of the problem perhaps.
>
> Well, as I wrote previously, it's things like the Libreoffice help files
> and the Tesseract recognition data which get pulled in via Supplements:.
> These can be quite large.  And some of the size difference is certainly
> unrelated to this issue.  (I was installing a total of twelve
> langpacks but I should probably be installing even more.)
>

Currently it is only really intended for a few (one or two) langpacks-*
packages to be installed.
Normally just for one's native language say. This may change as the
experience evolves.
I agree that installing all langpacks-* does not make sense - it will also
pull in many locales packages,
possibly duplicating locales in the glibc-all-langpacks archive.

And yes as Nicolas also said maybe we need: langpacks-ko-fonts and
langpacks-ko-input-methods, etc.
This needs a little more thought and discussion I feel, but we could
consider it for F31 or F32 surely.

Jens
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to