On 6/14/19 2:52 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 13/06/2019 à 20:31, Adam Samalik a écrit :
>> So, I'd like to discuss the libgit issue [1] [2] we're experiencing. With a
>> help of a few people, I've put together this post to get us on common
>> ground: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/modularity-vs-libgit/
>>
>> There are few ideas about solving the issue right now. But we might be able
>> to think about better ways to deal with similar issues long-term. Let's do
>> this!
> 
> IMHO, having library in modules is an error, this can only raise issues
> 
> Perhaps debian was right, and we should use a naming schema matching the
> library ABI, so including the soname
> 
>       libgit26-0.26.8
>       libgit27-0.27.8
>       libgit28-0.28.1
>       etc
> 
> Thanks to soname, library are perfect use case for parallel installation
> of multiple versions.

+1

We could go a step further and extend rpm and dnf to support multiple
versions of same named packages for installation.  This is doable but
not necessarily trivial.  Upgrades would need a way to specify what
package NVR they are upgrading (doable) and dependencies, requires, and
obsoletes would need to be reviewed to ensure you don't wipe out a
version you want installed.  Plus more.  Solvable and the same end
result for users, just a different approach.

> 
> And thanks to range version, this can be describe for dependencies.
> 
> BuildRequires: (pkgconfig(libgit) >=26 with pkgconfig(libgit) <= 27)
> 
> Yes, this will means more packages, and more reviews, but having a new
> review on a old library when soname change make sense.
> 
> Of course, old versions have to be retired when no more used
> 
> Modules are fine for applications.
> 
> 
> Remi
> 
> 
> P.S. yes compat_* name schema also works... but also consider it as a
> bit ugly...
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 


-- 
David Cantrell <dcantr...@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to