On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:08 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200 > > Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but > > > > it is not sent anymore. I last received such email on 11th of March > > > > 2018, so probably we don't really care ... > > > > > > The problem with that check is that it just checks if all dependencies > > > are provided by other packages, but it doesn't check if they can be > > > installed at the same time. So if I would have package with Requires: > > > foo + Conflicts: foo, that check won't tell anything. > > > > > > Same applies to rich dependencies "with", it just checks if one > > > condition is provided by anything so this check is not useful for > > > packages with rich dependencies at all… > > > > IIRC the original problem was that repoclosure used yum underneath which > > didn't understand rich/weak deps at all. Do we still wait on a tool > > using dnf/libsolv to provide equivalent functionality as repoclosure? > > "Weak" dependencies make the problem insuluble.
No, they don't. Weak dependencies are not hard to deal with. There are two ways to treat them in repoclosure: treat them as Requires or ignore them. Right now, we ignore them, but we could easily modify our repoclosure to treat them as Requires. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
