----- Original Message -----
> From: "Samuel Sieb" <sam...@sieb.net>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 11:52:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Switch RPMs to zstd 
> compression
> 
> On 5/30/19 2:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:31 PM Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/30/19 1:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>> I have no idea how deltarpm works, but if working on bit level
> >>> difference on uncompressed data, I don't see why local rebuild needs
> >>> to use the same compression level as the Fedora build system. If it's
> >>> working on compressed data, well I'm not sure how that works, in
> >>> particular if pixz is used which gives non-reproducible results.
> >>
> >> I was going to suggest earlier that deltarpm could use a faster
> >> compression when repacking.  But then I realized that the result has to
> >> be be bit-exact with the original so the package signing is still intact.
> > 
> > Package signing happens after compression? Compression is an
> > optimization, in no way does it affect the validity of the payload.
> 
> My understanding is that the signature is calculated over the compressed
> payload.  (I couldn't find any clear documentation on it with a quick
> search.)  I see that would make it simpler and somewhat quicker to
> verify, but it does cause problems with things like deltarpm and
> recompressing packages.
I guess we can't just switch what the signature refers to as there are other 
tools
that do this kind of verification on the compressed data, not just delta-RPM, 
right ?

So maybe, could we attach a second signature computed on the uncompressed 
payload ?
Delta-RPM could then use that to verify the reconstructed package & would be 
crazy fast,
as the slow XZ compression will no longer be needed to be performed client-side 
to verify 
the signature.


> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to