On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Till Maas wrote: > > Bodhi also allows you to edit the stable karma value and unless it is > > implemented differently (or has changed again), you can just use a > > stable karma value of 1 and ask someone except the update submitter to > > provide the +1 karma and the update can be pushed to stable. This is > > imho reasonable even after only a one line change to a build. > > You still need to get somebody to +1 the update, and more if people -1ed it
This is *really* not an onerous requirement. It simply means 'have one other person - any other person in the world with a FAS account - run your code and make sure it actually works before you release it'. If you don't think that's a good idea, well, I'm not sure what to say. > in the past due to regressions which are already fixed in the current edited > version. (Yes, update groups will be edited instead of obsoleted if we Please stop mixing minor bugs in the process in with high-flown rhetoric about the bureaucratic Board and whatever. This is simply a bug (or, possibly, an incomplete design; whatever you want to call it), in Bodhi. I think it's even already been reported and is planned to be addressed in future Bodhi. Luke? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
