[root@localhost ~]# sudo dnf --releasever=30
--setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing
distro-sync
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64                      536 kB/s | 2.4 MB
00:04
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates             71  B/s | 257  B
00:03
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test Updates                67  B/s | 257  B
00:03
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates                     62  B/s | 257  B
00:04
Fedora 30 - x86_64                              7.4 MB/s |  61 MB
00:08
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - VirtualBox                 3.2 kB/s | 6.9 kB
00:02
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'virtualbox'
Ignoring repositories: virtualbox
Error:
 Problem 1: package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
libblockdev(x86-64) = 2.21-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be
installed
  - libblockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64
 Problem 2: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires whois-nls =
5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
[root@localhost ~]#


On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 4:34 AM Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run:
> >
> >   sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30
> >   --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
> >
> > If you get this prompt:
> >
> >   ...
> >   Total download size: XXX M
> >   Is this ok [y/N]:
> >
> > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the real upgrade.
> > Upgrades will be fine for you.
> >
> > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case please
> > report it against appropriate package.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Miroslav
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Error:
>  Problem 1: package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libblockdev(x86-64) = 2.21-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - libblockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package python2-rpkg-1.57-6.fc29.noarch requires rpkg-common =
> 1.57-6.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - rpkg-common-1.57-6.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package python2-rpkg-1.57-6.fc29.noarch
>  Problem 3: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires system-
> release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
>  Problem 4: package system-config-date-1.10.9-2.fc24.noarch requires
> python-
> slip >= 0.2.21, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - python2-slip-0.6.4-12.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package system-config-date-1.10.9-2.fc24.noarch
>  Problem 5: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires libprotobuf-
> lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 6: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires whois-nls
> =
> 5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 7: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-repos(29)
> >=
> 1, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires system-
> release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-repos-29-3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch
>  Problem 8: package python3-flake8-3.6.0-2.fc30.noarch requires
> python3.7dist(pycodestyle) < 2.5.0, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - problem with installed package python3-flake8-3.5.0-6.fc29.noarch
>   - python3-pycodestyle-2.4.0-3.fc29.noarch does not belong to a
> distupgrade
> repository
>   - python3-flake8-3.5.0-6.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>  Problem 9: package dbus-common-1:1.12.12-2.fc30.noarch conflicts with
> fedora-release < 30-0.2 provided by fedora-release-29-7.noarch
>   - package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
> system-release(29),
> but none of the providers can be installed
>   - problem with installed package dbus-common-1:1.12.12-1.fc29.noarch
>   - package fedy-plugins-4.0.5-1.fc22.noarch requires rpmfusion-free-
> release, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - dbus-common-1:1.12.12-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package fedy-plugins-4.0.5-1.fc22.noarch
>  Problem 10: package dnf-yum-4.1.0-1.fc30.noarch conflicts with yum
> provided
> by yum-3.4.3-521.fc30.noarch
>   - package yumex-3.0.17-2.fc23.noarch requires yum >= 3.2.23, but none of
> the providers can be installed
>   - problem with installed package dnf-yum-4.1.0-1.fc29.noarch
>   - yum-3.4.3-518.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - dnf-yum-4.1.0-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package yumex-3.0.17-2.fc23.noarch
>  Problem 11: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires system-
> release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package dbus-daemon-1:1.12.12-2.fc30.x86_64 conflicts with fedora-
> release < 30-0.2 provided by fedora-release-29-7.noarch
>   - package fedy-plugins-4.0.5-1.fc22.noarch requires rpmfusion-free-
> release, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - problem with installed package dbus-daemon-1:1.12.12-1.fc29.x86_64
>   - package fedy-4.0.5-1.fc22.noarch requires fedy-plugins, but none of
> the
> providers can be installed
>   - dbus-daemon-1:1.12.12-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package fedy-4.0.5-1.fc22.noarch
> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
> packages
> or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Tom London
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to