On 2/28/19 4:23 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
> try to run:
>
>   sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
>
>   ...
>   Total download size: XXX M
>   Is this ok [y/N]:
>
> you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the real upgrade. 
> Upgrades will be fine for you.
>
> But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case please 
> report it against appropriate package.
>
> Thank you
>
> Miroslav
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

HTH:

Error:
 Problem 1: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
 Problem 2: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
 Problem 3: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
whois-nls = 5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64
 Problem 4: problem with installed package digikam-libs-5.9.0-2.fc29.x86_64
  - package digikam-libs-5.9.0-2.fc29.x86_64 requires
libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 Problem 5: problem with installed package digikam-5.9.0-2.fc29.x86_64
  - package digikam-5.9.0-2.fc29.x86_64 requires
libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both exiv2-libs-0.27.0-3.fc30.x86_64 and
exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64
  - package exiv2-0.27.0-3.fc30.x86_64 requires exiv2-libs(x86-64) =
0.27.0-3.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package exiv2-0.27.0-3.fc30.x86_64 requires libexiv2.so.27()(64bit),
but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package exiv2-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64
  - exiv2-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 Problem 6: problem with installed package digikam-doc-5.9.0-2.fc29.noarch
  - package digikam-doc-5.9.0-2.fc29.noarch requires digikam =
5.9.0-2.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package digikam-5.9.0-2.fc29.x86_64 requires
libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both exiv2-libs-0.27.0-3.fc30.x86_64 and
exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64
  - package gnome-color-manager-3.30.0-3.fc30.x86_64 requires
libexiv2.so.27()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package gnome-color-manager-3.30.0-1.fc29.x86_64
  - gnome-color-manager-3.30.0-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository

-- 
Roger Wells, P.E.
leidos
221 Third St
Newport, RI 02840
401-847-4210 (voice)
401-849-1585 (fax)
roger.k.we...@leidos.com

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to