On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:30 PM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> As long as we have no idea if the other maintainers are active, I am > strongly against the automation. I've been there. Followed nor > responsive policy just to find out later that instead of orphaning the > package, next inactive maintainer became owner. Very frustrating .... I think it may depend on the type of package, for some SIGs at least I think auto-retiring a needed working package is also rather frustrating since it generates extra work for the SIG to recover that package. Talking of which I just filed two review requests for ghc-fgl (which I had untired last year) and ghc-setlocale: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678677 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678684 which will unbreak xmonad and darcs. :-) Jens
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
