On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:34 AM Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote: > > On 13/02/2019 09:11, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:09 AM Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote: > > > >> I don't think that second consequence is entirely true. > >> > >> As I understand the the default module stream remains available > >> in the main repo and hence would be installable with things that > >> don't understand modules. There would be no ability to switch to > >> an alternate stream with other tools though. > > > > That's not true. If the modulemd isn't processed, all the RPMs are > > evaluated and the repo looks like a completely conflicting pile of > > nonsense. This is what makes PackageKit and dnfdragora scream. Though > > they don't crash on it anymore, which is a good thing. :) > > Not sure I follow... I don't see anything called modulemd in > the repodata and, for example, pkcon seems to be happy to install > ant on my rawhide vm. > > As I understand it modulemd is something which goes in a distgit > repo to control how modules are built? >
The fedora-modular repo has a modules.yaml.gz appended to it that is used for shipping module information for package managers to process for filtering rules. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
