On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:28:46 PM EST Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:33 PM John Harris <joh...@splentity.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:29:58 AM EST Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public Licensev1 (SSPL) is > > > not a Free Software License. > > > > > > > > For what reason is SSPL considered non-free? As I see, it's essentially a > > GPL incompatible AGPL license. > > > > > > > It restricts fields of endeavor and how you can use it. That conflicts > with freedom 0 of the Free Software Definition. In addition, no one is > sure it's actually possible to comply with the SSPL as worded, since > it attempts to convert the licensing of everything that's part of the > running system, including things not directly linked to it.
The ability to use proprietary software in combination with free software is not part of Freedom 0. -- John M. Harris, Jr. <joh...@splentity.com> Splentity https://splentity.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
