Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> writes: >>>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood <rharw...@redhat.com> writes: > > RH> If I backport this to fc29, will that assuage people's concerns? > > I think it would certainly help and I wouldn't complain. In fact, I'd > love to start running that as soon as I can. However, it wouldn't > help anyone who does a (supposedly supported) F28->F30 update. I do > not know if that is a significant concern.
Nothing would break, so it's technically correct to leave out right now I think. Since my f28 builds match f29 right now, I just did both: fc28: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0956d60ffd fc29: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d226c3ecf1 I've also updated the change page to mention that these warnings are present (and the versions they start appearing in). Thanks, --Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
