On Friday, December 14, 2018 2:33:36 PM EST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> for long time we have problem if you have some arch-specific
> BuildRequires, you still get one src.rpm from one of arches (not sure
> how koji chooses that one) which might not work for your architecture.
>
> For example if you have following in spec:
> %ifarch %{ldc_arches}
> BuildRequires: ldc
> %endif
>
> And the src.rpm is taken by koji from x86_64 (included in
> %{ldc_arches}), then you won't be able to run `dnf builddep foo`,
> because it will complain that ldc package is missing.
>
> PROPOSAL:
> 1. make fedora-release archful
> 2. add Provides: system-architecture($arch) to fedora-release, where
> $arch is architecture name
> 3. use Requires: (foo if (system-architecture(x86_64) or
> system-architecture(i686))) in packages
>
> What do you think? Any suggestions are welcome!
>
> --
> -Igor GnatenkoReally, I don't think that making what is a legitimate noarch package, such as fedora-release or generic-release (keep in mind this would affect both, and would be an extreme change affecting Remixes) is the way to go here. We can already test against architectures using `%ifarch`, and sure that's not clean when you're testing against a *range* of architectures, but it's definitely better than adding additional complexity to a noarch package. If anything, perhaps a virtual package, as suggested by others in this thread, would be the way to go. -- John M. Harris, Jr. <joh...@splentity.com> Splentity https://splentity.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
