On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:47 PM Mohan Boddu <mbo...@bhujji.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:30 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson >> > <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller >> >>> <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: >> >>>>> Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release >> >>>>> after F30 for these efforts: >> >>>> >> >>>> I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I expected a >> >>>> little >> >>>> more interest in this post. Perhaps it seemed like too much text to >> >>>> digest >> >>>> along with turkey and stuffing. :) I'm highlighting it with a subject >> >>>> reflecting the big, direct impact, and here's some other top-level >> >>>> proposals: >> >>>> >> >>>> * embrace Taiga (an open source kanban tool) for project planning >> >>>> * fix the compose speed (target: one hour!) >> >>> >> >>> Can I have a unicorn? Everyone wants this bug absolutely no one has >> >>> done analysis. >> >> >> >> I just don't believe this is true. I'm pretty sure Dennis and Kevin >> >> have both looked into it before. >> > >> > Yes, I mean recently, I was involved in the last time we attempted >> > this, and there was a number of things identified but quite a bit has >> > changed since that last happened. >> >> Yeah, I think our goal should be 1 minute... just as realistic as one >> hour. ;) >> >> I have not looked into things recently. However: >> >> * The mock fsync change (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7909) may help >> some. >> >> * We have plans to redo the setup on the s390x builders, which should >> result in them being much faster. That should help. >> >> * I know pungi maintaienrs have been doing some work to make things >> faster (even in the last release out this morning). >> >> All that said, I am not sure there's going to be a way to get it down to >> an hour. I think getting it down to 3-4hours may be very helpful tho and >> might be possible. > > I totally agree, also as Peter mentioned, IOT composes are just taking 1 hour > as its > just consuming the repo rather than generating newRepo as the normal > nightly composes does. If we can generate the newRepo on the fly whenever > a package gets build and just use the repo to generate the artifacts either > individually (splitting the compose) or parallely (as we are doing right now > mostly) > that would really help.
Unfortunately the newRepo/installer bit is likely the most I/O intensive, but I think it we split it out into it's own process, see mail I just sent, it would be a good start, and then also a good separate standalone focus for optimizations. Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
