On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:43 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like the raw format xz-compressed cloud images that we ship
> use a very large block size, possibly 192M.  This is not ideal and it
> would be better to use a smaller block size such as 16M so that they
> can be consumed without having to be uncompressed by nbdkit, or even
> be used remotely without even downloading them.
>
> (Long story here: https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2018/11/23/nbdkit-xz-curl/ )
>
> I recompressed the Fedora 29 cloud image using a 16M block size and
> there is about 4% overhead to doing this:
>
> before 194278292
> after  202874868
>
> At the moment I'm not clear what actual component does the xz
> compression step, so I don't even know where I could file a bug or who
> I could discuss this with, nor what the current code looks like.
> Apparently it's no longer done using appliance-tools.

The cloud images haven't used appliance-tools for years. It uses
imagefactory and some bits in koji.

Looking at the output of the logs it just runs:
$ /usr/bin/xz -z9T2
/var/tmp/koji/tasks/2418/31062418/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20181123.n.0.aarch64.raw

Example task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31062418

So at a guess it should be a straight forward patch to koji.

Peter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to