El vie., 16 nov. 2018 17:07, Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> escribió:
> >>>>> "IU" == Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> writes: > > IU> In this respect (the kernel), it's true that something changed > IU> compared to a decade ago: there was no LTS support upstream > IU> then. Now, there is. > > That is not really true. 2.6.16 (the first kernel that I recall anyone > calling some equivalent of "LTS") was released 12.5 years ago, while FC5 > was fresh. I do recall its existence being considered in the > discussions that happened in the FC6 timeframe, though I wasn't involved > in all of those. It was a very interesting time with the core-extras > merge and the community finally having a say in the maintenance of every > piece of the distro. Obviously the release cadence and lifecycle was a > big topic. > > - J< > AFAIK, that wasn't officially supported. Official LTS support started around 2011. Iñaki >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
