6.11.2018 23:15 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > [...] > Things are the way they are so that without the additional step of > specifying glibc-minimal-langpack, one get's all the locales by > default. This design was chosen for maximum backwards compatibility when > the langpack split was being made.
This case has been discussed during this year's Flock. Indeed, glibc-all-langpacks was introduced for backward compatibility when upgrading the Fedora systems predating langpacks. But it is considered a bug that glibc-all-langpacks is installed by default. The intention of splitting langpacks was to have only selected locales installed rather than all. > Installing no locales by default would probably be the default if we > were starting from scratch today, but when the split was made, a > different choice was made. I don't see enough benefit to revisit this. Sure, this may need a separate discussion. Regards, Rafal _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
