On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:41 PM Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> wrote: > > >>>>> "KP" == Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> writes: > > KP> That policy has been cancelled. Since the upgrade tools started > KP> doing basically "dnf distrosync (--allowerasing)" for upgrades, the > KP> upgrade path between distros stopped being a major issue and the > KP> policy has been dropped. > > If this is true then it's a rather huge change that should be announced > pretty loudly. After all, if we no longer care about ordering between > releases, then we are able to both drop Epoch: tags and remove the > extraneous 'c' from the dist tag. (With the slight caveat that rawhide > users need to use distro-sync at some point.) >
I'd personally love to be able to start resetting Epochs. There's no reason for them to persist beyond a release. I dunno if I'd be happy with losing `fc`, though. It's grown on me... :P We still have tons of references to Fedora Extras in our infra too (just look at most of our tracker bug labels!). I wonder if we now have more people in Fedora that came after the Core/Extras merge than before it...? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
