On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@protonmail.com> wrote: > > Il 04/10/18 17:22, Stephen Gallagher ha scritto: > > > > If FreePascal and Lazarus of the correct version are available in the > > standard repository (i.e. you don't have to specify a non-default > > stream of a module to get the correct version), you do not need to > > specify them explicitly in the module definition. > > Thanks! > > Just another question: what about if I need to use different .specfiles > for different Fedora releases? > For example, if FreePascal is upgraded in F29 and not in F28 I may need > to patch Skychart sources differently for F29 and F28...
It depends on the case. It *might* be an example of when you might decide that it's better to standardize on one version of FreePascal as a dependency and make it a module. So if you wanted to standardize on the upgraded version, you would create a FreePascal module stream for F28 of the newer version and have your Skychart module require the newer one there. Then you only have to maintain support for one of them. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
