Mattia Verga wrote: > The Group tag would not fix exactly what I mean. I wouldn't want to create > groups of packages, but apply descriptive tags of the abilities of the > package. > For example, in some of the packages I maintain: > ccdciel: astronomy, astrophotography, imaging, telescope > skychart: astronomy, telescope, planetarium > kpmcore: administration, disk, partition, utility > > ... so that a user can search for those tags in a package manager, instead of > searching Google to find what software can do what he's searching for and > then search for that package in the package manager to find if Fedora ships > it.
Why don't you just write your descriptions to include those words? One can already find CCDciel with "yum search all telescope", Skychart with "yum search all planetarium", and KPMcore with "yum search all partition". Searching for "astronom" (to catch both "astronomy" and "astronomer") finds both CCDciel and Skychart. You can improve on this by expanding your packages' descriptions to include the words you listed. If you can't come up with a sentence that describes your package and includes the word you want, then perhaps that word isn't actually a good tag for that package? Björn Persson
pgp4_sYGQi_UN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
