On 23.8.2018 00:31, Artur Iwicki wrote:
If we remove the Group: tag from existing packages (assuming 100% accuracy),
this would mean that the only way for a package to have the Group: tag would be
to:
a) have a maintainer add it back in
b) accept a new package with the Group: tag present
If we assume option a) to be unlikely, then wouldn't it make more sense to put the
"doesn't have a Group: tag" check in fedora-review, instead of rpmlint?
That is high likely. We have usual suspect packages that remove all mass
changes every time.
That said, I doubt their maintains would use rpmlint at all.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/N54KW2BJHF4BY2PISZGRGAQMFYN2XJHH/
