On 07/11/2018 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 07/10/2018 04:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:14:43PM -0700, Thomas Daede wrote:
On 07/03/2018 05:15 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
Move to uEFI as the default boot mechanism for ARMv7 devices.
Will this work with virt-manager too? Currently, while aarch64 boots via
uEFI there, it seems that armv7 is only supported by manually specifying
a kernel and initrd.
Ping.
Currently this won't work with virt-manager.
Yes, I'm aware.
If this arm32 stuff works similar to aarch64, then what we need is:
extend the edk2 package to build working arm32 images, some packaging
changes to libvirt, and some straightforward-but-not-trivial changes to
virt-manager to match.
My intention here was to look at the aarch64 support and copy that and
submit a patch. I would love help and I intended to reach out but have
been thumped with other escalations and problems so haven't had the
chance yet.
There is already an edk2-arm subpackage [1] in the Fedora builds and
it appears to work with my very basic testing.
Gerd Hoffman has a nightly edk2 repo which builds arm32 images. If
someone can figure out the magic qemu incantation to get those working
with Fedora, similar to how aarch64 works, I can do the rest
Awesome, will reach out to work with you, thank you!
FYI I've filed a bug to track virt-manager work, so if anyone is
interested jump on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613996
Thanks,
Cole
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NUSBNR2QEW2LG5OFLCWYIGNZDQQHHB37/
