On 07/23/2018 02:35 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.7.2018 v 14:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 23.7.2018 v 14:14 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 14:07, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/23/2018 02:00 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 13:12, Jitka Plesníková wrote:
I've added BR glibc-common, because it contains the iconv binary. iconv
is used in spec file.
Maybe it's better to do:
BuildRequires: %{_bindir}/iconv
instead?
We need to add explicit provides first to the glibc (sub)packages, to avoid
triggering a filelist download in DNF.
File provides in %{_bindir} and %{_sbindir} aren't supposed to trigger
filelist download as far as I know.
Correct, they are part of primary metadata ... and file lists are
downloaded anyway ...
Just FTR:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/549
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Guidelines&diff=417413&oldid=417412
Can we please update the Packaging Guidelines to reflect this new
reality? In particular, mention that dependencies on %{_bindir}/iconv
are okay?
Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RAB4UDJR6QEPBAKYBTLOPBBMTUAVJOAI/
