On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:13 PM Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 19-07-18 17:42, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com
> <mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi All,
> >
> >     I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain
> >     and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'.
> >
> >     A quick check shows that these are all caused by a missing
> >     BuildRequires on gcc / g++ related to:
> >
> >     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot
> >
> >     I'm not sure if this means that the FTBFS script has been run before
> >     all the automatic fixing which was planned for this was in place;
> >     or if this means that the automatic fixing missed many many
> >     packages, but either way something needs to happen here, the amount
> >     of work now being pushed onto packagers caused by:
> >
> >     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot
> >
> >     Is unacceptable IMHO.
> >
> >     If the FTBFS script has ran too early, all the FTBFS bugs need to be
> >     closed and the FTBFS script has to be run again later.
> >
> >     If the automatic BuildRequires fixing script missed all these, then
> >     I suggest that:
> >
> >     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot
> >
> >     Gets reverted for now and we again close all the FTBFS bugs and
> >     rerun the script for them after doing a fresh build with the
> >     buildroot restored as it was.
> >
> >
> > No one promised that I'm going to fix 100% of packages, I've fixed
> around 2k packages. What my regex couldn't catch -- please send me list of
> packages, I will analyze them and try to fix as much as possible.
>
> Ok, thank you for offering to take a look at this. Here are the
> FTBFS bugs which I've received so far, it seems that the bot
> has stopped filing bugs after getting through all packages
> starting with a-b? Or no packages which I co-maintain have
> failed starting with c-z??
>
> Anyways here is the list so far. Note I've not yet analyzed
> these, so some might have a different cause, feel free to
> leave those as is and I will get around to them eventually.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603260
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603263
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603266
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603267
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603274
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603319
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603321
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603348
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603351
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603365
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603366
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603369
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603383
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603398
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603410
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603431
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603456
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603457
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603503
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603506


I've fixed regex a bit and fixed ~150 more packages.

I believe that the rest could be done by maintainers.
-- 

-Igor Gnatenko
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7KIII23YPP62PU335FAEAPHXOAOQEZEZ/

Reply via email to