On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:47:43 -0700 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:31 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On 04/08/10 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > >> I have a modified package locally and want to install and test > > >> it. Since it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 > > >> version too. How? > > > > > > Is there a reason not to use mock locally? > > > > I might want to try a build for an architecture I can't do locally, > > such as a ppc64 build for EPEL. > > > > > That's how I'd do it - just > > > 'fedpkg srpm' then 'mock -r fedora-14-i386 --rebuild > > > foo.src.rpm' . You'll need mock 1.1.3 to do successful builds > > > on / for F14, though. > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=188082 > > > > Huh? I don't seem to be having any trouble building F14/F15 > > packages on my F13 builder with mock 1.1.1 at the moment. > > That's a neat trick, since 1.1.1 didn't even have configs for Fedora > 14. I roll all of my own mock configs, with different names from the bundled ones so they don't disappear when a new mock version comes around. > They were added in 1.1.2, but were broken, since they enabled the > 'updates' repository, which doesn't work for F14. Additionally > there's a problem with the SELinux plugins in 1.1.2 which broke > building for me. 1.1.3 fixes the F14 mock config and the SELinux > plugin problems. I've been using my own workaround for SELinux issues: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2010-April/003055.html Not sure what the SELinux plugin does; do you know of any documentation for it? Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
