On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > Jarod Wilson wrote: >> I'm not having any problems submitting builds and adding tags by hand >> *which is exactly what we did in cvs*. What exactly is ESSENTIAL about >> the nvr tags being automated for you? > > The fact that most builds will end up with no named tags at all because > dist-git doesn't enforce manual tagging nor is it in the packager SOP. > Having successfully built versions be tagged in the SCM so that the sources > corresponding to a given NVR can be easily checked out at any time was > posted as one of the essential requirements on the SCM setup. The current > implementation does not comply to that essential requirement.
Define "easily". I can look at koji for a specific build n-v-r, and get its git hash quite easily. Then I can tell git to show me the tree when it was at that git hash. Not as easy as if n-v-r tags were already in place, which would avoid the need to talk to koji, but still hardly hard. > Thus, this is > a showstopper which should have blocked putting dist-git into production. See above. > Plus, automatic tagging was promised as THE reason we switch to dist-git in > the first place. Huh? "THE" reason? Um, no. And there *are* automatic tags. They're call git hashes. -- Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
