Stephen opened this FPC ticket: https://pagure.io/packaging-
committee/issue/777
So, I'm stepping back from writing the draft... think it would just slow
down the process, since you folks
are more clear on what you're wanting - and I'm fine with what both Stephen
and Jason wrote previously.

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote:

> FESCo has decided to review this topic at their next meeting.  I will hold
> off submitting
> another draft pending the results of that discussion.
>
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1918
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> >>>>> "GBC" == Gerald B Cox <gb...@bzb.us> writes:
>>>
>>> To me this doesn't make much sense in the context in which you have put
>>> it.  The existing hardware activation section is just this paragraph:
>>> ...
>>> I don't disagree with the idea behind what you're proposing, but the
>>> hardware activation section is quite the wrong place to put it.
>>>
>>> It seems to me that a far more appropriate place would be in the
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices document
>>>
>> ...
>>
>> Completely agree.  I'll make the changes and repost another draft via
>> email.
>>
>> Thanks for you help Jason!
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2EJWUYY7T3WIKJFA5TJ7CT3OGWNR6MZT/

Reply via email to