Stephen opened this FPC ticket: https://pagure.io/packaging- committee/issue/777 So, I'm stepping back from writing the draft... think it would just slow down the process, since you folks are more clear on what you're wanting - and I'm fine with what both Stephen and Jason wrote previously.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote: > FESCo has decided to review this topic at their next meeting. I will hold > off submitting > another draft pending the results of that discussion. > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1918 > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>>> "GBC" == Gerald B Cox <gb...@bzb.us> writes: >>> >>> To me this doesn't make much sense in the context in which you have put >>> it. The existing hardware activation section is just this paragraph: >>> ... >>> I don't disagree with the idea behind what you're proposing, but the >>> hardware activation section is quite the wrong place to put it. >>> >>> It seems to me that a far more appropriate place would be in the >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices document >>> >> ... >> >> Completely agree. I'll make the changes and repost another draft via >> email. >> >> Thanks for you help Jason! >> >> >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2EJWUYY7T3WIKJFA5TJ7CT3OGWNR6MZT/