On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Kyle Marek <pspps...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anaconda in F28 currently claims /boot cannot be vfat. However, this appears > to be an artificial limitation, because `grub2-install` works and makes a > bootable GRUB with a vfat-typed --boot-directory. > I'm not sure why there would be an issue with /boot being vfat. I guess two > good questions to ask that might offer some insight: > > What filesystem limitations make vfat unappealing? (do we need symlinks?) Unappealing from a non-shared distro-centric point of view: no xattr, no POSIX permissions or owners, no links. Some of those things are unappealing and maybe disqualifying for a shared boot, security labels being one. So many things here are in possible conflict from the distro centric way of viewing the world, that simply have to change if we're really going to get to a shared $BOOT world. > Does Fedora plan to support installing with bootloaders other than GRUB on > x86? extlinux is an option supported by anaconda, it's not supported in that if something about it doesn't work we aren't going to block release; but it's a preferred bootloader for some VM images I think Cloud stuff was or is using extlinux. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z5GA5SWIMS2TH3FFBX2MS5WAY2GGUTDU/
