Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Having said all this, the message about brokenness on x86 SIG mailing > list doesn't appear to be treated with the urgency I think it needs, > givin the ripple effect it has from a critical path package. There were > a few messages the day after it was reported, and then nothing until > Wednesday.
It is pretty clear that the x86 mailing list is just a fake put up to keep the architecture running. Just look at the ridiculously low activity at: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/x...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ This month's activity is unusually high because the "F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64" thread (i.e., the discussion on enabling SSE2) was mostly cross-posted from this list (devel) to that list (x86). But otherwise this is little more than a Potemkin village. There is very little going on behind the façade. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PE54WTVCMS7HF4U52RL3PTWTXXAZ6DOH/
