On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:53 AM Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 31-05-18 12:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:24 AM Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com
> <mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi All,
> >
> >     I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
> >     end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
> >     to the graphical login manager without him seeing any
> >     text messages / menus filled with technical jargon.
> >
> >     IIRC we used to hide the grub-menu by default on single
> >     OS installs, but we seemed to have stopped doing that,
> >     for new Fedora 29 installs I would like us to start
> >     hiding the menu by default on single OS installs again,
> >     see:
> >
> >     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HiddenGrubMenu
> >
> >     The goal if this email is to:
> >     1) Give people an advance warning about the plan to change
> >     this so we can discuss this early on
> >
> >     2) See if anyone knows why we stopped doing this, I think
> >     we may simply have stopped doing this to simplify to bootconfig
> >     code in anaconda and because we did not always identify the
> >     single OS case correctly, but I wonder if there were other
> >     reasons?
> >
> >
> >
> > I think part of the reason is that non-technical people might not know
> how to recover if a kernel update had a regression leaving their system
> unbootable. At least with the boot config screen there, it offers them
> something to try.
> >
> > I would be concerned if we drop this without instituting an alternative
> way to (perhaps automatically) revert to an older kernel if boot failed to
> reach some sensible systemd target.
>
> Revert to the older kernel, or show the menu?
>

Showing the menu provides the user a way to revert to the older kernel, so
it's fine with me.


>
> I also have working on fastboot support on my TODO, which means not
> checking for a keypress in grub *at all* because that check will
> cause EFI firmware to scan all USB busses for a keyboard which can
> be quite slow. This indeed involves setting a "boot_success"
> grub environment variable, which grubs clears at boot and if
> not re-set the next boot grub will not fastboot.
>
>
Interesting. How slow are we talking about? Measured in milliseconds or
seconds?


> The fastboot stuff is more of a Fedora 30 then 29 thing, but I
> guess I could bring the bits which signal a successful boot
> forwards to 29 and use that to decide between showing the menu
> with our default 5 second timeout and hiding it and waiting 1 sec.
>
>
If we are hiding it and have no detected keyboard, what's the value of
waiting one second anyway? Shouldn't we skip the wait entirely?


> The plan for fastboot was to show the menu, not to auto fallback
> as there can be many reasons why the boot has failed.
>
>

> This will basically get us back the F28 behavior of showing the
> menu but only after a failed boot, I think that is a good
> solution, do you agree?
>
>
Yeah, that would be fine with me.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TTA5ZZUVJAHJB5Z46MAEHX27JRXBXXJT/

Reply via email to