On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote:
> Michal Schorm wrote: > > So far, on F>=28 the TokuDB was build without jemalloc. > > It may be risky to rely on, yet no one complained. > > IMHO, if it works (well enough that nobody is complaining), just keep > shipping it that way. It's better than to break dependencies (if you don't > > Obsolete the subpackage) or silently drop functionality (if you do) in an > update (which will probably even be a security update) to a stable release. The biggest problem for me is, that as a maintainer, I have no idea, how wide, skilled or satisfied the user base is. If something is obviously broken, I get bugzilla filed or Bodhi update commented. But other than that, I don't know if - for example in TokuDB - are problems present, but there is some workarounds, which skilled DB admins use but it doesn work for them by default. So I just hope "silence means yes - it works". -- Michal Schorm Associate Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BTS5AXZKVB7MYJZJPBLLEI6WPZQDXB7A/
