On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:26:30PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "RB" == Randy Barlow <bowlofe...@fedoraproject.org> writes: > > RB> > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results?testcases=dist.python-versions.python_usage > > This one seems on-point. rpm 4.14.1-9.fc28 fails: > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results/21327930 > > Is it possible to filter only failures out of the results list? > > RB> So we could look through these to find packages that fail. Of > RB> course, a downside to this approach is that there will only be data > RB> for packages that have been built since these tests existed, so > RB> unmaintained packages might not appear in these results even though > RB> they could have problems. > > That's pretty much the same for most things in this domain. Any change > we make to any build-time configuration isn't going to have any effect > until packages are actually built. > > Still, at least personally I would much rather have something fail when > I do a mock build to tell me that something deep within the build > process is calling /usr/bin/python. Waiting until after the slowest > koji builder has managed to churn through a package to find out that you > missed a python execution somewhere is not nearly as useful.
When you put it like this ... this is exactly what the change under discussion does! (I know you know, I'm just highlighting it because that's a different way to describe the Change that hasn't been expressed before in this thread.) Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VSF2BIP63ULBSBCN7A2ZJZVOIL5HSIIK/
