On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:38:13PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 17:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > "ES" == Eric Smith <space...@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > ES> What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory
> > ES> like /usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if
> > libdir
> > ES> is /usr/lib64? Is there something better than
> > ES> %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d?
> >
> > It seems that there isn't. I would just use /usr/lib/modules-load.d
> > directly.
> >
> > You will get an rpmlint complaint about direct use of /usr/lib, I
> > suppose. Not much to be done about that. Technically a macro for
> > this
> > could be added, but only a few packages need to do this so I suspect
> > it
> > wouldn't be worth it.
>
> from VirtualBox.spec we use :
>
> %{_prefix}/lib/modules-load.d/
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9036
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LH273KKFRSSDZECHV6HWMXZNZOVOVGUI/
