2018-04-03 13:11 GMT-06:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com>:
> > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:01 PM Christian Glombek <c...@petersen-glombek.de> > wrote: > >> I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been >> shipped in the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this affects major >> updates, it is leading to problems elsewhere (i.e. people have to uninstall >> some apps on v13 and re-install them on v13.0.1 for them to work again). >> >> And how many people actually still run NC v10? >> > > > Given the current status, I suggest you just ask FESCo to give you > permission to release 13.x without supporting upgrades from 10.x and then > submit a Magazine article explaining the situation once 13.x is landing. As > far as the bundling question; that's actually fair game these days as long > as your packages have a virtual `Provides: bundled(packagename) = > <version>` in the specfile so if we needed to locate packages for security > issues, it can be done. So if you wanted to package the intermediate > versions(*) with bundled libs to get people through the upgrade, that's an > option too. > > > +1 should be a nice changes for the F29 release.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
