On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:54 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:33:44PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 07:35:00PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > >> So please let us just repeal that "Rawhide can never go backwards" > > >> policy. > > > > > > This is actually a fair point, but I wonder what prevents us from > doing it > > > today. > > > > Technically, nothing. This is purely a policy issue. > > I'd be curious if there isn't more than just this, or if someone remembers > why > that policy was created. > > I *think* that the reason for Rawhide not being able to go backwards is simple RPM limitations; if people have updated their system with rawhide packages and encounter a serious bug, if we just roll the updates repo back to the previous working package, the people who upgraded to it have no *automatic* way forwards. Though, I suppose we could perhaps implement this policy if we special-cased (or simply encouraged) people on Rawhide to use distro-sync instead of simple update. But that has its own issues.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
