On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> > wrote: > > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > > > "%global sover <X>" and using it in %files? > > > > > > If nothing else it should at least be documented as a best practice. > > > > Not yet another bureaucratic guideline making it harder to maintain > > packages! > > > > Hardcoded soversions in specfiles are a pain! > > > Unannounced soname bumps are a pain :)
Right. It's not "bureaucratic" if it's a specific response to a real problem that keeps happening. That's more or less the *opposite* of bureaucratic. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
