On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 07:36, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 14:33 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > What I'm trying to say here is that each time we want to implement
> > > some feature in Fedora, we either need to have some replacement in
> > > EPEL or diverge Fedora branches from EPEL branches. Having
> > > replacement is not always possible, especially if we start utilizing
> > > new (actually 8 years old) features of RPM.
> >
> > I'd really like to see us tend towards coming up with macros that
> > provide elegant fallbacks on EPEL. (The %license macro is a good
> > example.)
>
> There is no fallback for rich dependencies. There is no fallback for
> filetriggers.
Just a wild idea, how about:
%if 0%{rhel} && 0%{rhel} < 8
%global recommends Requires
%else
%global recommends Recommends
%endif
and then using
%{recommends}: foo
?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
