----- Original Message -----
> From: "nicolas mailhot" <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>
> To: "Jakub Cajka" <jca...@redhat.com>
> Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to 
> Fedora" <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 2:22:26 PM
> Subject: Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a
> 
> Hi,
> 
> So, to be more scientific, I did a complete rebuild from scratch of my Go
> spec stash in rawhide, both with Go 1.10 and forcing the previous Go 1.9.2
> (about 300 packages, some of which are not supposed to build yet because I
> still need to finish the unbundling and bootstraping of docker in addition
> to consul, etcd, cobra and runc)
> 
> I have 58 more packages failing with Go 1.10 (though some are probably
> fallouts that depend on a packages Go 1.10 does not like). Starting with
> Google’s own golang.og/x/debug!
> 
> Maybe Go 1.10 is not ready for use yet?

Have you investigated the build failures to have such strong claim?

I'm finishing going through distro wide rebuild(all ~500 packages) and roughly 
74 packages are failing to build. Nearly all build failures are caused by 
errors(inefficiencies) in the packages code or stale/inactive packagers, with 
no direct  relation to the go compiler itself. I see less than 1% of packages 
that look like candidates for golang bugs.

I will post results when I finish(in ~1-2 days).

JC

> 
> Build logs of both runs by PM, they take around 100 MiB each uncompressed
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot
> _______________________________________________
> golang mailing list -- gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to