On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> After reading all responses in thread which is mentioned in subject I
> think we
> need to develop some policies / procedures how to deal with old cruft, for
> example:
>
> - - Requires: systemd-units
> - - Requires: /bin/mktemp
>
> Former has changed to systemd in guidelines X years ago (not sure when
> exactly,
> before I did my first package which contains systemd units, so I would
> guess
> something like 5-6 years ago). Latter was removed more then decade ago but
> we
> kept old Provides around for compatibility and seems after 10 years people
> still rely on them.
>
> Do you have ideas how policy / procedure of removal those should look like?


Maybe a good first step would be to add detection of these to rpmlint? I
usually try the skim my spec files for modernization stuff but I know I
don't catch everything. A tool (rpmlint or otherwise) would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to