Hi,

I totally agree with the spirit, but that would require Red Hat taking a more 
active role in backporting package tooling to RHEL/EPEL.

Latest guidelines are always more efficient for everyone (Red Hat employees 
includes), but all too often they can't be applied to EPEL because no one at 
Red Hat pushed the corresponding rpm, mock, rpmdevtools, macro updates to RHEL 
or EPEL :(

The more packages Fedora ships the more inefficient it is to require RHEL/EPEL 
packagers to use old guidelines in every spec files to avoid tooling backports.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to