Dne 27.7.2017 v 16:56 Martin Langhoff napsal(a): > Turns out that Elixir should not be noarch, as some of its code is > endianness specific. What's best practice to switch away from noarch > for packages in current Fedora? How about EPEL? > > I see this outdated and unresolved Packaging Comittee > issue... https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/117 > > and I see a bunch of bugs referring to specs (and rpms) that fail > during upgrades. Some have obsoletes on their own name, others don't. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753149 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230183
This was related to rubygem-bson and I switched the rubygem-bson from noarch to arch in this commit: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/rubygem-bson.git/commit/?id=f507fa3ee0e8b29e60ef6164c28733691332dea4 I don't think there should be any additional concern ATM. Vít > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301306 > > Is there clarity / consensus on this? Any packages that have made the > transition successfully recently? > > cheers, > > > > martin > -- > martin.langh...@gmail.com <mailto:martin.langh...@gmail.com> > - ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff > - don't be distracted ~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff > by shiny stuff > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
