On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> >  F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> >       their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> >       packaging.
> 
> At least we see where this is going.
> 
> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks?  Sandboxing isn't one
> of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.

Huh? How would you get sandboxing without Flatpaks? Unless you are
proposing a different sandboxing technology.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to